Monday, November 19, 2018

Statement from Utah Republican Party Constitutional Defense Committee

Statement from Utah Republican Party
Constitutional Defense Committee

National, State and Political Organizations Across Political Spectrum File Amici Briefs on Behalf of Utah GOP

National, state and political and policy organizations from across the political spectrum have filed amicus briefs in support of the Utah Republican Party’s petition to the United States Supreme Court petitioning the court to hear the party’s challenge to SB 54, the controversial 2014 Utah law which dictates how political parties must choose their nominees.

Filing amicus briefs in support of the party’s petition are:
• Senators Mike Lee and Ted Cruz and Representative Rob Bishop and Raul Labrador
• Nineteen Current and Former Utah State Senators and Legislators
• National and State Political Parties. National parties include the Green, National Independent American and Constitution Parties and seven state Libertarian parties and Idaho Republican Party.
• The Pacific Legal Foundation and Cato Institute
• Judicial Watch
• Eagle Forum
• Private Citizen

On Tuesday, October 9, the Utah Republican Party filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court in its challenge to overturn SB 54 which dictates how Utah political parties choose their nominees. Interested parties had 30 days to file the amicus briefs.
Selected Quotations from the Amici Briefs:

Senators Mike Lee and Ted Cruz. Representatives Rob Bishop and Raul Labrador: “Amici file this brief to emphasize the need for this Court to grant review and reverse the Tenth Circuit’s decision, which disregards the long tradition in America of party autonomy regarding nomination processes and the value of the particular nomination process overridden by the Utah statute at issue.”
 
Current and Former Utah State Senators and Legislators: “The issue of whether a government may constitutionally impose on a political party the kind of substantive intrusion that SB54 represents has divided the Party and the state and will not be resolved absent the Court’s examination of the issue, since the governor has promised to veto all SB54 repeal measures. This is the ideal vehicle for the Court to vindicate the First Amendment rights of political parties.”
 
National and State Political Parties: “The Tenth Circuit’s ruling has the potential to make political parties powerless in making decisions that limit the influence of money or that address any other unique challenge.”
 
The Pacific Legal Foundation and Cato Institute: ““[A]nother vital truth: Because political associations ‘aspire to rule the state,’ those in power look upon political parties with an ‘instinctive abhorrence’ and stand ready to ‘combat them on all occasions.’ The First Amendment stands as a bulwark against the natural tendency of the state to co-opt political parties for its own purposes.”
Judicial Watch and Allied Educational Foundation “The right to freely associate is ‘almost as inalienable in its nature as the right of personal liberty. No legislator can attack it without impairing the foundations of society.’”
 
Eagle Forum: “The Petition for a Writ of Certiorari should be granted because the First Amendment rights of political parties are a matter of enormous national importance, and the Tenth Circuit gravely erred in allowing government to interfere with how political parties nominate their candidates.”
 
SB 54 was passed by the Utah Legislature during the 2014 session. The Utah Republican Party immediately filed suit and won the first portion of its constitutional challenge, overturning an onerous stipulation requiring the Party to allow non-Republicans to participate in nominating its candidates. SB 54’s restriction on a party’s ability to use Utah’s traditional caucus-convention system in nominating candidates, however, was upheld by the 10th Circuit in a split decision.

Thursday, March 1, 2018

Statement from Utah Republican Party Constitutional Defense Committee

For Immediate Release
Contact:  Don Guymon
for Constitutional Defense Committee - Utah Republican Party

Statement from Utah Republican Party Constitutional Defense Committee

Republican leaders clarify intent of special meeting and new bylaw language

Tuesday, February 27, 2018 - Salt Lake City, UT. Don Guymon, spokesperson for the Utah Republican Party Constitutional Defense Committee (“CDC”), released the following statement to correct false information, reported in the news, regarding the purpose and outcome of the Saturday, February 24, 2018 meeting of its governing body, the State Central Committee (SCC):

The SCC meets regularly, and sometimes monthly, as needed, to address Party business, including organizing for caucuses and elections. The 2018 Caucus takes place on Tuesday, March 20. For this reason, in accordance with our rules, the SCC members called a special meeting on Saturday, February 24, to address Caucus preparation, budget issues, and bylaw modifications, including modification of an existing bylaw that has been under discussion since 2013.

State statute authorizes political parties to challenge the candidacy of any candidate who violates party rules.

Additionally, Justice Scalia in the U.S. Supreme Court decision on California Democratic Party vs. Jones stated:

In no area is the political association's right to exclude more important than in its candidate-selection process. That process often determines the party's positions on significant public policy issues, and it is the nominee who is the party's ambassador charged with winning the general electorate over to its views. The First Amendment reserves a special place, and accords a special protection, for that process...because the moment of choosing the party's nominee is the crucial juncture at which the appeal to common principles may be translated into concerted action, and hence to political power…

Since 2015, candidates have been required to certify they will not violate the party rules, but the bylaw lacked enforcement language. Under the new bylaw language, a candidate who willingly files to run, using a method contrary to Republican Party rules, temporarily forfeits membership in the Party, for the duration of the election cycle.

 These changes were made in consultation with legal counsel and in compliance with U.S. Supreme Court precedent and Utah Code Section 20A-8-401-(2a) . This Court precedent was confirmed in the Party’s recent successful constitutional challenge to election law changes, which the Utah Legislature passed in 2014 (Senate Bill 54). It is SB54 that is unconstitutional and is the subject of the current lawsuit.

If the Republican Party Executive Committee chooses to enforce this bylaw change, it does not affect any candidate already filed to run, and during the 2018 election cycle, it only applies to U.S. House Districts 1 and 2, so that no already filed candidate will be impacted.

 For more information, Contact Don Guymon