Whether you like Sen. Mike Lee or not you should consider the following. The delegates almost eliminated him at convention.
re:
Sen. Bennett in 2010. He was not in the top 2 coming out of convention.
In fact the more moderate of the two, Tim Bridgewater was selected by 57% of the
delegates in the last round of voting by the delegates. If he had received 60% Tim Bridgewater would have been the party nominee and Mike Lee would have been eliminated.
Sen. Bennett endorsed Tim Bridgewater during the primary, but
with voters ticked at TARP and ObamaCare, they went with Mike Lee.
Sen. Mike Lee was the party nominee after the primary
The
Neighborhood Election and Convention system in Utah is the best way to
make sure a grassroots process can win over large amounts of money. It
is the only way someone with $100,000 can go against someone with $2
million in election funds.
We
have a system that that does NOT favor the incumbent, the wealthy or
the famous. This is a good thing, and should be preserved.
At only one time for 10 years in Utah’s history did the state depart
from the Neighborhood Election, Caucus and Convention System. In 1937, a
powerful democratic state senator convinced enough of the legislature
to switch to an open primary. He had had two losses, a US Senate race
and also for governor, because the majority of the convention delegates
disagreed with his legislative voting record. But he was well known and
had money.
Many at the time felt like an open primary was his
ticket to the governorship, and he did win. But the change in the system
only lasted for a decade. After public and media disillusionment, and
even worse voter turnout, Utah restored the Caucus and Convention
System. Why go back?
Our current problem with voter turnout is it has not kept up with the
population increases. The voter turnout keeps going up but not as fast
as the population. Some of that is the younger voters, where Utah has a
larger percentage of them and they aren't, as a group, as involved. We
need to educate those moving in and not understanding our system.
Many citizens who attend their neighborhood elections and caucus
meeting become interested in politics and get involved in their
communities, the state and the nation. They meet and help candidates
become elected. Some then later become candidates. This should be
encouraged through education.
The system and the experience
attending the meetings can always be improved, but the “Count My Vote”
initiative isn't the way to do it. Any changes to the system the
political parties use to determine their nominees should be determined
by the political parties.
Fair Elections Utah Working to improve, but not gut, our neighborhood election caucus system. The Caucus System in Utah is the best way to make sure a grass roots process can work over large amounts of money. It is the only way someone with $100,000 can go against someone with $2,000,000 in election funds. We had a system that did NOT favor the incumbent, wealthy or famous. This was a good thing. SB 54 made things bad. The New Count My Vote is worse.